You can believe in whatever you want, but if you want to believe in the
truth -- you must be rational.
"In the absence of compelling reasons
to believe, unbelief should be preferred."
Menu:
Is the Bible inspired?
10 Simple and Obvious Reasons Why Not to Believe in
the Bible
1. The Biblical order of
creation is grossly incorrect: Grass and fruit trees were certainly not the
first life forms, and birds certainly didn’t exist before land animals. This
has no scientific support what-so-ever. Actually nothing much is in correct
order. There is also no mention of microbes
2. There is no mention
anywhere in the Bible of prehistoric animals, nor prehistoric people – no cave
people. It is also clear that Adam and Eve were not themselves cave
people: Gen 4:2 "Abel became a sheep farmer, but Cain farmed the
land." The first people on earth were already contemporaries with the
writers of the story -- farmers and herdsmen -- not hunters and gatherers.
3. The story of Adam and
Eve can be shown to be taken from ancient Babylonian Mythology: “The Alphabet
of Ben Sira is the earliest form we know of the Lilith legend. It is here
that we find Lilith as Adam's first wife.” (Eve comes later) The
entire Genesis account can easily be seen to have been taken from a combination
of Samarian, Babylonian, and Greek mythology (see below).
4. Original
Sin: The creation story culminates in the so called "original sin," which
seeking redemption from, is what the entire rest of the Bible is about.
However, there logically could never have been such an event. All decisions,
like everything else, require causes, or as what psychologists would call --
antecedent factors. All such causes or antecedent factors that would have led
to any and all decisions made by Adam and Eve were supplied directly by God.
God made them and everything else in their world. Like all decisions, given the
particular set of circumstances that Adam and Eve were in, there would have been
no other decision they could possibly have made but to have eaten the forbidden
fruit. It is logically inconceivable that God could not have been responsible
for the behavior of his own direct design and influence. It is not possible to
defeat this argument. No belief in "free-will" will suffice. All decisions
require reasons -- bar none, and all the "reasons" in the Garden of Eden were
provided directly by God. The exact same argument makes it impossible for the
Devil to have come into existence. God made all the angels and provided all
antecedent factors. No angel could have rebelled if it had not been for the
factors God himself provided, thus Satan is also a myth. If both original sin
and Satan are not true, then the Bible has no foundation and it can't be true
as to its religious tenets.
5. God wanted offerings
from Cain and Able and judged those offerings according to their value.
Offerings or sacrifices to a god is clearly paganistic, and proves the
Bible is just an extension of false pagan notions and traditions. Offerings
continue throughout the Old Testament.
6. The story of Noah’s
Ark is as absurd as anything ever written. It’s simply impossible to put two of
every animal on earth onto a boat, and feeding and caring for them for
10 months would have been impossible. This story also has its roots in more
ancient fables and mythology. Please see this interesting and humorous
discussion:
http://members.aol.com/darrwin/flood.htm
7. The crucifixion of
Jesus is just more paganistic notions that the better the sacrifice the more God
will be pleased. How can someone die for someone else’s sins? How can the
barbaric treatment of one man have anything at all to do with the original sin
or sins in general? No one can be punished for someone else’s wrongs, and a
loving God would not require such a gruesome act upon any person.
8. Jesus himself said
several times that he would return “soon,” within the lifetime of those he spoke
to, but two-thousand years later we’re still waiting.
9. Believers rely much
upon using predictions as evidence the Bible is inspired, but it can readily be
shown that dozens of predictions and prophecies where never fulfilled, and those
that were, may have been edited in at a later time or simply written after the
event occurred.
10. The general tenets of
the Bible are obviously mythological in nature, even if many accounts and people
are actual. The basic tenets are as follows: God creates everything
including humans, humans sin thus causing all the problems we must live with,
bad people descend from the sinners, the bad people are destroyed by a huge
flood except for one good family (Why should there have only been one good
family?), God demands sacrifices throughout the bible, God’s own son becomes the
perfect sacrifice that will make up for humans’ original sin, there will be a
huge final war that will destroy the world as we know it. God’s son will then
return, and we will live happily ever after in paradise (at least for those who
believe this bizarre story). How is this story any different from other
ancient mythology? Please read some of the following for similarities:
Compare the Bible to Greek
creation myths:
The ancient Greek Culture 2000 BCE to about 50 BCE
About 1200 BCE.,
the residents
of, what we
would call,
Greece and Asia
Minor shared a
common belief in
a group of
deities that
came to be known
as The
Olympians.
They can be
traced
to three main
sources: Homer,
Hesiod and The
Homeric Hymns,
circa 800 BCE.
http://www.messagenet.com/myths/essays/origins.html
In the beginning, Chaos, an
amorphous, gaping void encompassing the entire universe,
... Eurynome separated the sky from the sea by dancing on the waves of
Oceanus.
In the
beginning there was only chaos. Then
out of the void appeared Erebus, the unknowable place where death dwells, and
Night. All else was empty, silent, endless, darkness. Then somehow Love was born
bringing a start of order. From Love came Light and Day. Once there was Light
and Day, the earth appeared.
Prometheus had assigned
Epimetheus the task of giving the creatures of the earth their various
qualities, such as swiftness, cunning, strength, fur, wings. Unfortunately, by
the time he got to man Epimetheus had given all the good qualities out and there
were none left for man. So Prometheus decided to make man stand upright as
the gods did (in our image) and to give them fire.
Hephaestus, fashion a wicked but beautiful creature to torment Prometheus.
It was a woman, whom they named
Pandora, which means "all gifts". She was given a precious and beautiful
box, which she was told not to open, but curiosity got the better of her, and
out flew "all the evils that plague men." The only "gift" that stayed in the
box was "Hope".
In the classic Greek myths,
the gods flooded the world and destroyed the human race because of its
wickedness. However, Deucalion and his wife were granted safe passage
through the destruction by building and provisioning an enormous wooden chest,
after which they repopulated the world by throwing over their shoulders
stones, which were magically transformed into people. Deucalion was also
strongly associated with the vine as indeed, was Dionysus (Bacchus), god of wine
and vegetation in general. A common theme in classical Greek art and myth was
that of `Dionysus at sea', sailing in his boat with grapes hanging from the
rigging. Also ancient Greek hymns describe a boat crowded with animals.
Every myth, Greek or otherwise, that has ever been told or written, varies in the telling. The basic themes are repeated in many of them, but details, even story lines will differ considerably, from village to village, eon to eon.
When one understands that the myths have been told for many centuries before being written down, which first occurred about 800 BCE, one can relish the differences in the tellings and enjoy the Greek's brilliant and artful imagination throughout the ages.
Compare the Bible to
Sumerian
creation myths:
The ancient
Sumerian Culture
3500 BCE to about
1900 BCE
Sumerian myths
dates to at
least pre
2500 BCE -- long
before any date
given to the
writing of
Genesis
has stories
similar to
Genesis 1-11.
Some the
important texts
are: Eridu
Genesis which
parallels
Genesis 1-11,
The Sumerian
King List
which is similar
to Genesis 5,
The Sumerian
Flood Story, The
Song of the Hoe
which tells
about the
creation of the
world and man,
Enki and Ninmah
which is the
earliest text
dealing with
man's creation,
Emerkar and the
Lord of Aratta
which deals with
times before
civilization
began.
The "earth" in
the Eridu
Genesis is not
the globe.
Rather, Genesis
speaks of God
using pillars
(buckling of the
land) to raise
the earth or
fruitful place
up between the
liquid waters
and the waters
in the
atmosphere. This
fruitful place
or earth created
a place where
animal and plant
life could
exist. If man
can evolve from
matter, then the
ancient mind
would say that
the gods can
also evolve. And
in the ancient
literature they
do, based upon
the "survival of
the fitest."
The Eridu
Genesis
is a Sumerian
text. It covers
the creation of
the world,
invention of
cities and the
flood. After the
universe was
created out of
the chaos of the
sea, the gods
evolved and
they in turn
created mankind
to farm,
herd and worship
them. Cities and
kingship
was created but
the gods decided
to destroy
mankind with a
flood.
Ziusudra (Upnapishtim)
from Eridu
was instructed
by Enki
(Ea) to build a
boat to survive
the flood blown
up by Enlil.
After the flood
he worshipped
(prostrated)
himself before
An (Anu) and
Enlil (Bel) and
was given
immortality for
his godly life.
In one Sumerian
myth the goddess
Ninhursag
created a
beautiful garden
full of lush
vegetation
and fruit trees,
called
Edinu,
in
Dilman, the
Sumerian
earthly Paradise,
a place which
the Sumerians
believed to
exist to the
east of their
own land, beyond
the sea.
Ninhursag
charged
Enki, her
lover, with
controlling the
wild animals and
tending the
garden, but
Enki became
curious about
the garden and
his assistant,
Adapa,
selected seven
plants and
offered them to
Enki, who ate
them. (In
other versions
of the story he
seduced in turn
seven
generations of
the offspring of
his divine
marriage with
Ninhursag).
This enranged
Ninhursag,
and she caused
Enki to fall
ill. Enki
felt pain in his
rib, which
is a pun in
Sumerian, as the
word "ti" means
both "rib"
and "life.
The other gods
persuaded
Ninhursag to
relent.
Ninhursag then
created a new
goddess named
Ninti, (a
name made up of
"Nin", or
"lady", plus "ti",
and which can be
translated as
both Lady of
Living and
Lady of the Rib),
to cure Enki.
Ninhursag is
known as mother
of all living
creatures, and
thus holds the
same position as
Eve. The
story has a
clear parallel
with Eve's
creation from
Adam's rib,
but given that
the pun with rib
is present only
in Sumerian,
linguistic
criticism places
the Sumerian
account as the
more ancient.
Compare the Bible to
Babylonian
creation myths:
The ancient
Babylonian Culture 1900 BCE to about 500 BCE (was in many was a continuation of
the Sumerian culture).
Enuma Elish
~
Enûma Elish
has existed in
various versions
and copies, the
oldest probably
dating to at
least 1700 B.C.E.
The Babylonian "Epic of Creation
-- Enuma Elish" is written on seven tablets. …texts that were not
unlike the Genesis creation in the Bible. However, it is generally accepted
that the Enuma Elish was written during the time of the Sumerians, well
before the book of Genesis. George Smith first published these texts in 1876
under the title The Chaldean Genesis.
The Babylonian God finished his
work within the span of six tablets of stone. The last and seventh
stone exalted the handiwork and greatness of the deity's work. Thus the
comparison must be made that the seven days of creation found in the Bible
borrowed its theme from the Babylonians, who had borrowed it from the Sumerians.
The Sumerian epic places Anu,
Enil and Ninurta as the heroes. The Babylonian epic stars Marduk. Some portions
of the tablets are illegible.]
Comparison
of Bible's 1st Creation Story with Babylonian Creation Story
The Babylonian creation story is
called by its first two words "Enuma Elish." According to archeologists,
it was originally written circa 1120
BCE. It was discovered in 1875
CE. It bears many points of similarity to the first creation story in the
Bible:
Late 12th century BCE
(this is probably the date of the actual tablets
that are stored in London. The myth itself goes back to at least
1700 BCE.)
Date of writing
(conservative belief)
13th century BCE, the
time of Moses
Same as above.
Author (liberal belief)
"P," authors of the
Priestly tradition.
Unknown.
Author (conservative
belief)
Moses.
Unknown.
Creator(s) of the
universe
A single God, YHVH.
A God battling a
Goddess.
Initial state of the
earth
Desolate waste; covered
in darkness.
Chaos; enveloped in
darkness.
First development
Light created.
Light created.
Next development
Firmament created - a
rigid dome over the earth separating the earth and heaven.
Firmament created; also
perceived as a rigid dome.
Next development
Dry land created.
Dry land created.
Next development
Sun, moon, stars
created.
Sun, moon, stars
created.
Next development
Creation of men and
women.
Creation of men and
women.
Final development
God rests and sanctify
the Sabbath.
Gods rest and celebrate.
The Story of Lilith
In the original Babylonian myth,
the Gods created the first people: a man and his wife Lilith. The Gods cast
Lilith out of the garden because of a variety of transgressions. She retained
her immortality and was believed to come awake only during the night and to feed
on the blood of children and animals. Eve was then created as the second wife.
This ancient myth was adopted by the Jewish J tradition and inserted into
Genesis, Chapter 1 circa 550 BCE. They stripped out the references to the first
wife. Lilith is now only seen in Isaiah 34:14 where her name is variously
translated "screech owl", "night monster" or "night hag".
The
Alphabet of Ben Sira is the earliest form we know of the Lilith legend
familiar to most people (that is, to most people who are familiar with Lilith at
all). It is here that we find Lilith as Adam's first wife. Scholars tend to date
the Alphabet between the 8th and 10th centuries, BCE. Whether the story
itself is older, or, if so, how much older is not possible to say. Amulets like
the one described in the first paragraph are, of course, much older. The author
of the Zohar, R. Moses de Leon, was aware of the Alphabet's
version of Lilith, at least according to Gershom Scholem (Major Trends in
Jewish Mysticism, p. 174), but he also knows other, probably older, Lilith
traditions which do not mesh well with this one. No attempt is made, apparently,
to harmonize them. For one of these other traditions, and comments on whether
the author was familiar with the Alphabet, see
Treatise on the Left Emanation.
The idea of Eve having a predecessor is also not new to Ben Sira, and can be
found in
Genesis Rabbah . But those traditions make no
mention of Lilith, and, in fact, do not mesh well with Ben Sira's version of the
story. [AH]
"The angles who are in charge of
medicine: Snvi, Snsvi, and Smnglof. After God created Adam, who was alone, He
said, 'It is not good for man to be alone' (Gen. 2:18). He then created a
woman for Adam, from the earth, as He had created Adam himself, and called her
Lilith. Adam and Lilith began to fight. She said, 'I will not lie below,' and he
said, 'I will not lie beneath you, but only on top. For you are fit only to be
in the bottom position, while am to be in the superior one.' Lilith responded, 'We
are equal to each other inasmuch as we were both created from the earth.'
(Eve was made from Adam’s rib to show equality) But they would not listen to one
another. When Lilith saw this, she pronounced the Ineffable Name and flew away
into the air. Adam stood in prayer before his Creator: 'Sovereign of the
universe!' he said, 'the woman you gave me has run away.' At once, the Holy One,
blessed be He, sent these three angles to bring her back.
"Said the Holy One to Adam, 'If
she agrees to come back, fine. If not she must permit one hundred of her
children to die every day.' The angels left God and pursued Lilith, whom they
overtook in the midst of the sea, in the mighty waters wherein the Egyptians
were destined to drown. They told her God's word, but she did not wish to
return. The angels said, 'We shall drown you in the sea.'
"The authors of Genesis seem
have picked up part of their story from Hindu legends of the creation and early
history of humanity. Stories of Hindu heroes Adimo, Heva, Sherma, Hama and
Jiapheta apparently were replicated into legends about Adam, Eve, [...]"
Genesis 1:1 to 2:3: This was
written by an anonymous writer or group of writers from the 6th Century
BCE, generally referred to as "P." He/they were of the priestly tradition.
Most religious liberals believe that the first creation story in Genesis was
based upon
an earlier Babylonian Pagan myth of origins.
Genesis 2:4a: This was written
by an anonymous writer, called "R," a redactor who joined the writings of "p,"
"J" and two other writers or groups of writers into the present Pentateuch.
Genesis 2:4b to 2:15: This was
written by "J," an anonymous writer or group of writers who lived in the
sourthern kingdom of Judah, and wrote parts of the Pentateuch between 848
BCE (when King Jehoram gained power in Judah) and 722 BCE when the Assyrians
destroyed the northern kingdom of Israel, taking its people into exile. Some
scholars date J to the 10th century BCE.
☼
How did
Sumerian
mythology get
into the Bible?Abraham was
the patriarch of
the
Judeo-Christian
religion as well
as Islam.
The Bible itself
says he was born
in the Sumerian
city of Ur, in
the southern
region of
Mesopotamian."The
world in which
Abraham lived.
According to the
Biblical
chronology
adopted in this
dictionary
Abraham was born
in 1950 b.c.
left Haran for
Canaan after the
death of his
father in 1875
b.c., visited
Egypt between
1875 and 1864
b.c., and died
in 1775 b.c.
after having
lived in Canaan
for 100 years.
He was born in
Ur in southern
Mesopotamia
during the
Neo-Sumerian
period. In about
1960 b.c."
What more does a
person need to
show a
connection?
In addition, the entire
Sumerian Empire
lasted from 3500
to 1900 BCE.
The earliest
date given for
the writing of
Genesis is about
1450 BCE.
Since the
Sumerian empire
ceased to exist more
than
400 years before
the oldest date
given for
Genesis being
written,
there is no
doubt that any
Sumerian myth is
at least 400
years older than
the Genesis
account.
Actually many of
the Sumerian
myths are from
before 2500 BCE,
over 1,000 years
previous to
Genesis.
Also, the date 1450
BCE for the
possible oldest writing
date of Genesis
comes about
one-third the
way into
the Babylonian
Empire, allowing
450 of
Babylonian
mythology to
have influenced
the Bible in
addition to
Sumerian myth.
The Babylonian
Empire lasted
from about 1900
to 500 BCE.
One must also
keep in mind
that the date of
around 1450 BCE is given to
the writing of
Genesis
because this
would have been
the time of
Moses.
However, there
is speculation
if Moses was
even a real
person and it is
clear that
Genesis 1 and
Genesis 2 are
two separate
accounts, quite
dissimilar and
written by two
different
people.
That being the
case, it would
have been
impossible for
Moses to have
written both
accounts, or
unlikely he
wrote Genesis at
all. When
Genesis in
analyzed on its
own, without
having to attach
it to Moses, the
date of its
writing is often
placed many
centuries later.
☼
Some Christians
argue that the
accounts in
Genesis were
handed down
through the
generations
finding their
way from Adam to
Noah and
eventually to
Moses who just
transcribed
them
around 1450 BCE.
Thus, the true
historicity of
Genesis predates
any other
civilization's
myths and served
as their basis.
Furthermore,
that ancient
societies tend
to elaborate
myth rather than
simplify as time
goes by, and that older
myth is in fact
simpler than
later versions
of the same
stories.
For an
interesting
discussion along
these lines,
please see
http://www.british-israel.ca/Genesis.htm
This is
an interesting
concept, and if
one were to
believe the
Bible accounts
to be true, it
would be
reasonable.
However,
Adam and Eve
could not have
known anything
about the
details of the
creation that
preceded them,
so they could
not have passed
those details
along. We
would have to
believe that
Moses had
both: accounts
handed down to
him about the
lives of Adam
and Eve, and
divine
inspiration to
fill-in the
details of
creation.
We would also
have to assume
that the account
of the Garden of
Eden somehow got
to Moses without
all the
elaboration that
one finds in the
ancient
mythologies.
The principle of
parsimony
requires that
one accept the
simplest
explanation,
eliminating
needless
assumptions.
If we assume
Adam and Eve
actually
existed, we
still cannot
ignore that Abraham was
a Sumerian from
the city of
Ur, making
a solid
bridge between
the
mythology of of
Sumerians and
the Bible.
Nor, can we
ignore that the
Sumerian word "ti"
clearly
established a
relationship
between "rib"
and "life," which
could have
easily provided
the bases for
Eve being
created from
Adam's rib.
However, if we believe
that Sumerian
mythology
influenced the
creation account
in Genesis, we
can
ignore the
existence of
Adam and Eve and
the assumption
that they
handed the
accounts down
through the
ages, since
those things are
less certain to
be true and add
needless
assumptions.
Occam's razor
cuts Adam and
Eve out along
with the handed-down theory.
☼
Clear reasons
why a
fundamentalists
view of the
Bible cannot be
correct
by ~ Brother
Mark
Creation
~There
can be no doubt
that there is
something to
evolution, even
if certain
aspects are
difficult to
envision. If
evolution has
not occurred
there would be
no evidence at
all. Even
fundamentalists
accept that
micro-evolution
occurs. One
must wonder then
if there can be
small changes,
why not large?
And, if
micro-evolution
occurs why
doesn’t the
Bible make
mention of it?
Original sin
~ Couldn’t have
actually
happened because
everything that
Adam and Eve had
to base their
decision on came
directly from
God. God not
having any
responsibility
is not logically
possible. This
is
self-contradictory.
It constitutes
an impossible
paradox where
somehow the
designer is not
responsible for
the design, or
that the design
can behave
outside of its
design
characteristics.
Furthermore,
punishment is
about behavior
change, not
about what is
just somehow
deserved, and
there was no
intent to change
Adam and Eve’s
behavior in the
story.
Noah’s Ark
~ Not a logical
self-contradiction,
but simply
absurd.
Imagining
representatives
of all the
animals where
somehow gathered
to go on the Ark
is just clearly
fable. And, how
would they all
have gotten off
the mountain to
travel to all
the various
places in the
world? It’s
just not
possible.
Absurd things
don’t happen.
The Tower of
Babel ~ We
know that humans
invent
languages. No
linguist in the
world would
support the
notion that the
various
languages came
from Babel.
Christ’s
redemptive
crucifixion
~ Nerves are to
protect us from
harm, not to
serve as a
source of
punishment. No
God would abuse
his own creation
in such a way.
Also, no one can
suffer for
someone else.
Punishment is
about behavior
change and
punishing the
wrong person
does not bring
about behavior
change.
Revelation
and the
Apocalypse ~
This is
dooms-day
thinking. It’s
not going to
happen and is
destructive to
human thought in
that it teaches
us that things
will never get
better, but only
worse. It’s a
ridiculous story
that undermines
motivation for
future human
achievement.
It’s a sin to
believe in
ridiculous
things because
it distorts
logical
thought. It’s
an abuse of the
mind. It
is logical
thought that
advances us.